Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Diantonio v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2012cv60879
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Anne Diantonio
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patrick et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2012cv60883
Plaintiff:
Lottie M. Patrick and John D. Patrick
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv21452
Plaintiff:
Maria McDonald
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maritza Valle v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv60648
Plaintiff:
Maritza Valle
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bodah v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 9:2012cv80333
Plaintiff:
Carole Ann Bodah
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bodah v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv14105
Plaintiff:
Carole Ann Bodah
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schachtman v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2012cv60209
Plaintiff:
Rhoda Schachtman
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doyle v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv14040
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Doyle
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thaman et al v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 2:2011cv14390
Plaintiff:
Susan Thaman and Robert Thaman, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pharmed Group Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv21434
Plaintiff:
Pharmed Group Corp. and Pharmed Group Corp.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Consumer Product Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
