Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. v. Terran Orbital Corporation
as 9:2020mc80718
Plaintiff:
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
Intervenor:
PredaSAR Corporation
Defendant:
Terran Orbital Corporation
Zhang et al v. Raymond James & Associates Inc., et al
as 1:2016cv24655
Plaintiff:
Zheng Zhang , Haiyun Hu , Lixia Wang and others
Defendant:
Raymond James & Associates Inc., , Joel Burstein and Ariel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Casseres-Pinto v. Quiros et al
as 1:2016cv22209
Plaintiff:
Jose Casseres-Pinto
Defendant:
Ariel Quiros, William Stenger, Peoples United Financial, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goldberg v. Raymond James Financial, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv21831
Plaintiff:
Michael I. Goldberg
Defendant:
Raymond James Financial, Inc. , Raymond James & Associates, Inc. , Ariel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Hiller Sanchez v. Raymond James & Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv21643
Defendant:
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and Joel Burstein
Plaintiff:
Carlos Enrique Hiller Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Daccache v. Raymond James Financial, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv21575
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Daccache
Defendant:
Raymond James Financial, Inc. , Raymond James & Associates, Inc. , Ariel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Brink v. Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
as 0:2015cv60334
Plaintiff:
Jyll Brink
Defendant:
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, et al v. Waterman Broadcasting Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv22007
Defendant:
Tod Beneficiaries on File, Waterman Broadcasting Corporation, Sharon Rosenhause and others
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Law Debenture Trust Company of New York and Wilmington Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
