Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Digital Landscape Inc. v. Maui Jim USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01174
Defendant:
Maui Jim USA, Inc. and Maui Jim, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Digital Landscape Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
SNI Solutions, Inc. et al v. Univar USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv04090
Plaintiff:
SNI Solutions, Inc. and Natural Alternatives, LLC
Defendant:
Univar USA, Inc. and Road Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
John King Chains Limited v. John King USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01094
Plaintiff:
John King Chains Limited
Defendant:
John King USA, Inc. , JK Resources, Inc. , Chainco, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Integrated Stealth Technology, Inc. v. Columbia Insurance Company et al
as 3:2016cv03231
Plaintiff:
Integrated Stealth Technology Inc.
Defendant:
Columbia Insurance Company , MiTek Holdings, Inc. and MiTek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Columbia Insurance Co. et al v. Integrated Stealth Technology Inc.
as 3:2016cv03091
Plaintiff:
Columbia Insurance Co. , MiTek Holdings, Inc. and MiTek USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Integrated Stealth Technology Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ESCO Corporation et al v. Cashman Equipment Company et al
as 1:2013cv01409
Plaintiff:
Esco Corporation and ESCO Canada, Ltd
Defendant:
Cashman Equipment Company , Caterpillar Global Mining, LLC , Caterpillar Inc and others
Counter_claimant:
Caterpillar Global Mining, LLC , Cashman Equipment Company , Caterpillar Inc and others
Counter_defendant:
ESCO Canada, Ltd and Esco Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Restricted Spending Solutions LLC v. Allow Card of America Inc et al
as 3:2009cv03120
Plaintiff:
Restricted Spending Solutions LLC, Restricted Spending Solutions LLC and Restricted Spending Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Allow Card of America Inc, Palm Desert Investments, Wachovia Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Triune Star, Inc v. The Walt Disney Company et al
as 1:2007cv01256
Plaintiff:
Triune Star, Inc and Triune Star, Inc
Defendant:
The Walt Disney Company, WDIG Mobile, LLC, Pantech & Curitel Communications, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Tate & Lyle Technology Limited et al v. AIDP Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02050
Plaintiff:
Tate & Lyle Technology Limited, Tate & Lyle Technology Limited, Tate & Lyle Technology Limited and others
Defendant:
Beijing Forbest Chemical Co Ltd, Beijing Forbest Chemical Co Ltd, Beijing Forbest Chemical Co Ltd and others
Counter Claimant:
US Niutang Chemical Inc
Counter Defendant:
Tate & Lyle Technology Limited and Tate & Lyle Sucralose Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
