Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Roman v. Moro et al
as 1:2015cv01456
Plaintiff: Enriqueta Roman and Daniel Moro
Defendant: U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Consulate General of the U.S., Juarez, Mexico and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Mogell v. Calhoun et al
as 1:2015cv01239
Plaintiff: Rosalee Mogell
Defendant: David L. Calhoun, Daniel M. Dickinson, Juan Gallardo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Coker v. Donahoe
as 2:2014cv02042
Plaintiff: Daniel Coker
Defendant: Patrick R Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1401
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
as 2:2013cv02279
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv03415
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dees v. Smith et al
as 3:2013mc00028
Plaintiff: Rodney Dees
Defendant: Angela Smith , James Daniel Sisk and Patrick Ferguson
Askra Maritime Co. Ltd. v. Archer Daniels Midland
as 2:2012cv02291
Plaintiff: Askra Maritime Co. Ltd.
Defendant: Archer Daniels Midland and ADM International SARL
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Archer Daniels Midland Company et al v. Paillardon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02227
Plaintiff: Archer Daniels Midland Company and ADM Latin America Inc
Defendant: Regis Paillardon
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Archer Daniels Midland Company v. CSX Transportation Inc
as 2:2011cv02212
Plaintiff: Archer Daniels Midland Company
Defendant: CSX Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
Barber v. Forsyth
as 4:2011cv04044
Plaintiff: Richard E Barber
Defendant: Daniel Forsyth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?