Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Maxim Solutions LLC v. Great Logistics Group LLC
as 1:2020cv03110
Defendant:
Great Logistics Group LLC
Plaintiff:
Maxim Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coyote Logistics, LLC v. Noble Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00421
Defendant:
Noble Trucking, Inc. and Ghuman Transport, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Coyote Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Company Inc
as 1:2017cv06940
Plaintiff:
Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc.
Defendant:
Becton, Dickinson and Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coyote Logistics, LLC v. RS Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00939
Plaintiff:
Coyote Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
RS Express, Inc. and US Expressway Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Canadian National Railway Company v. Fisher Printing, Inc.
as 1:2009cv05882
Plaintiff:
Canadian National Railway Company
Defendant:
Fisher Printing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
SKF USA Inc. v. Equipment Reliability Services, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02232
Plaintiff:
SKF USA Inc., SKF USA Inc., SKF USA Inc. and others
Defendant:
Equipment Reliability Services, Inc., Equipment Reliability Services, Inc., Equipment Reliability Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United Van Lines, LLC v. Meilinger et al
as 1:2008cv00145
Plaintiff:
United Van Lines, LLC and United Van Lines, LLC
Defendant:
Paul Meilinger and Barbara Meilinger
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce Act
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company v. ATS, Inc.
as 1:2006cv03402
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc. v. AA Rebuilt, Inc.
as 1:2006cv00822
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Jack Gray Transport, Inc. v. Cardigan Coal & Coke Corp. et al
as 1:2005cv02533
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
