Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Few v. San Jose Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv03832
Plaintiff:
Jenessia Few
Defendant:
San Jose Police Dept., Cynthia Beltran-Hahn, Trent Tessler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Baez, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 1:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Decendant David James Baez and Pro Hac Vice Raymond Frank Baez
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Child Support and The People Of The State of California
Claimant:
SPECIAL COUNSEL Raymond Frank Baez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Federal Trade Commission V. Amgen Inc., et al.
as 1:2023cv03053
Counter Defendant:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Amgen Inc. and Horizon Therapeutics PLC
Plaintiff:
New York, State of, State of California, State of Illinois and others
Intervenor:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Conone v. Enterprise Rent A Car of Los Angeles, CA. et al
as 1:2022cv02839
Plaintiff:
Kurt A Conone
Defendant:
Enterprise Rent A Car of Los Angeles, CA., Does (1-100), Inclusive, Firestone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
United States of America et al v. Gatan, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03048
Defendant:
Gatan, Inc. and Roper Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
United States of America and The State of California ex rel. Relators Brent Bailey, Emily Wade and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
United States ex rel. John Hendrix et al v. Laverick
as 1:2013cv01624
Defendant:
George Laverick
Plaintiff:
United States , State of California , State of Delaware and others
Movant:
J-M Manufacturing Inc., Co
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Caston et al v. Switzerland Government et al
as 1:2009cv06253
Plaintiff:
Charles Caston, North Korea and Pauline Caston
Defendant:
Switzerland Government, L.A.P.D. Rampant, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
