Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Crooks v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv06089
Plaintiff:
David Crooks
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company, AO Smith Corporation, ABB Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Ayotte v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2018cv02662
Defendant:
The Boeing Company , A.W. Chesterton Company, H.B. Fuller Company and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Ayotte
Cross_claimant:
The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company , The Toro Company , Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Daniel L Ayotte , United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
Industrial Holdings Corporation , MTD Products, Inc. and Tenneco, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC , Carlisle Industrial Brake & Friction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kirkendall v. AO Smith Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv09024
Plaintiff:
Mary Jean Kirkendall
Defendant:
A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ryan v. Airgas Merchant Gases LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01953
Plaintiff:
Michael C Ryan
Defendant:
Airgas Merchant Gases LLC, Alfa Laval, Inc. , Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Claisse et al v. Boeing Company, The et al
as 1:2009cv03722
Defendant:
Boeing Company, The, GE Corp., GE Aviation and others
Plaintiff:
Isabelle Claisse, Melanie Worthy, Estrelita Magdalene January and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Airline Crash
Banham et al v. P.T. Garuda Indonesia et al
as 1:2009cv01389
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Banham, Michael Harvey, Sebastian Banham and others
Defendant:
P.T. Garuda Indonesia, GE Commercial Aviation Services, LLC, GE Commercial Aviation Services, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
