Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dale et al v. Myers et al
as 3:2021cv50093
Defendant:
Jonathan Grandstrand, Michele Myers, Mark Grandstrand and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Sjostrom, Michael Leopardo, Chris Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Dale et al v. Myers et al
as 1:2021cv01144
Defendant:
Jonathan Grandstrand, Michele Myers, Mark Grandstrand and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Sjostrom, Michael Leopardo, Chris Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ruttenberg et al v. EON Clinics, P.C. et al
as 1:2020cv02948
Plaintiff:
Isabel Ruttenberg and Amanda Lawson
Defendant:
EON Clinics, P.C., Rajan Sharma and Mintu Sharma
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dale et al v. NFP Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv02942
Plaintiff:
Joel Sjostrom, Board of Trustees of the NORTHERN ILLINOIS ANNUITY FUND AND PLAN, on behalf of the Participants of the Northern Illinois Annuity Fund and Plan, Jose Zamarripa and others
Defendant:
NFP Corp., Stephen Curry, Jerry Korchak and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Lawson v. Chicago Rail Link LLC
as 1:2012cv06824
Plaintiff:
David Lawson
Defendant:
Chicago Rail Link LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawson v. CarMax Auto Superstore, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00866
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lawson
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstore, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Zdziarski et al v. Swanson et al
as 1:2009cv07571
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Zdziarski, Cheryl Zdziarski, Cheryl Zdziarski and others
Defendant:
David C. Swanson, Michael P. Connors, Thomas J. Reddin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Chicago Tile Institute Welfare Plan et al v. RCI Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00633
Plaintiff:
Chicago Tile Institute Welfare Plan, Chicago Tile Institute Welfare Plan, Chicago Tile Institute Pension Plan and others
Defendant:
RCI Enterprises, Inc. and Jason Lawson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
