Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Baldwin et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00350
Plaintiff:
Laura Baldwin and Jeffrey Baldwin
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lonngren et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00017
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dan Lonngren and Suzanne M. Lonngren
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Brown v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc.
as 1:2013cv08833
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shirley Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McTigue v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2013cv07887
Plaintiff:
Patrick McTigue
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayernik v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07862
Plaintiff:
Mark Mayernik
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International Limited, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv06150
Plaintiff:
Lynn Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Premier Orthopaedic Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCarthy v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv06154
Plaintiff:
William McCarthy
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Premier Orthopaedic Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05356
Plaintiff:
James Clark
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Premier Orthopaedic Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maves v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2013cv02138
Plaintiff:
Melody Maves
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Jacobs et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07764
Plaintiff:
Linda D Jacobs and Thomas Jacobs
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Premier Orthopaedic Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
