Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Werner v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07245
Plaintiff:
Nichole Werner
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burke v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv08352
Plaintiff:
Thomas Burke
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Davol, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeMauro v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05824
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Lynn DeMauro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Iovino v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv04263
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Judith Iovino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baxter International Inc et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 1:2014cv00498
Plaintiff:
Baxter International Inc , Baxter Healthcare Coporation and Baxter Healthcare S.A.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc, Ethicon, Inc., Ferrosan Medical Devices A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Moore et al v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 1:2012cv06205
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Moore and Ronald Moore
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nevel et al v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 1:2012cv05805
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Nevel and Thomas Nevel
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burkhart v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 1:2012cv03927
Plaintiff:
Denise Burkhart
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Gynecare, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young-Poole v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 1:2012cv03761
Plaintiff:
Brenda Young-Poole
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fugate et al v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 1:2012cv03039
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Fugate and Jeffrey Fugate
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
