Cases 41 - 50 of 274
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO v. J & J Asphalt Paving, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
J & J Asphalt Paving, Inc., an Illinois corporation and J & J Asphalt Paving, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO v. Maxx Contractors Corp.
as 1:2022cv00882
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
Maxx Contractors Corp., an Illinois corporation and Maxx Contractors Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund et al v. M2 Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00423
Plaintiff:
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund, Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund, Midwest Operating Engineers Retirement Enhancement Fund and others
Defendant:
M2 Construction, Inc. and Ramon Calderon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund et al v. Hacienda Landscaping, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06583
Plaintiff:
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund, Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund, Midwest Operating Engineers Retirement Enhancement Fund and others
Defendant:
Hacienda Landscaping, Inc. and Maria Guzman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Dome Technology, LLC v. International Union Of Operating Engineers Local 150, District 1
as 1:2021cv06455
Plaintiff:
Dome Technology, LLC
Defendant:
International Union Of Operating Engineers Local 150, District 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund et al v. Johnson Site Work, Inc., an Illinois corporation
as 1:2021cv06138
Plaintiff:
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund, Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund, Operating Engineers Local 150 Apprenticeship Fund and others
Defendant:
Johnson Site Work, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 399 Health & Welfare Trust et al v. Pacific Tai, LLC
as 1:2021cv05566
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 399 Health & Welfare Trust and International Union of Operating Engineers Local 399 Educational Training Fund
Defendant:
Pacific Tai, LLC doing business as Best Western Grant Park and Pacific Tai, LLC doing business as Best Western Grant Park, an Illinois Limited Liability Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 399 Health & Welfare Trust et al v. Wabash 11th, LLC
as 1:2021cv05569
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 399 Health & Welfare Trust and International Union of Operating Engineers Local 399 Educational Training Fund
Defendant:
Wabash 11th, LLC doing business as Homewood Suites-Chicago South Loop and Wabash 11th, LLC an Illinois Limited Liability Comapany doing business as Homewood Suites-Chicago South Loop
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 399 Health & Welfare Trust et al v. Whitehall Hotel, LLC
as 1:2021cv05564
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 399 Health & Welfare Trust and International Union of Operating Engineers Local 399 Educational Training Fund
Defendant:
Whitehall Hotel, LLC doing business as Whitehall Hotel and Whitehall Hotel, LLC doing business as Whitehall Hotel, an Illinois Limited Liability Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO v. Metropolitan Steel, Inc., an Illinois Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv03693
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
Metropolitan Steel, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Iron Workers, Local Union No. 1, a Labor Organization, Metropolitan Steel, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
