Cases 41 - 50 of 193
Ismailov et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv04962
Plaintiff:
Mirlan Ismailov and Nazgul Dangilova
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Director Kevin J. Riddle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Darji et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv07172
Plaintiff:
Kamelash Darji and Dipika Darji
Defendant:
Mr. Alejandro Mayorkas, Kevin J. Riddle, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Blystone v. Riddle et al
as 1:2022cv05768
Plaintiff:
Trajanka Blystone
Defendant:
Kevin J. Riddle and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Strugar et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv05402
Plaintiff:
Dorde Strugar and Sarah strugar
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Kevin J. Riddle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04270
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
