Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Cases 41 - 50 of 282
Aprillia, et al v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2023cv04649
Plaintiff: TANIA APRILLIA, as Personal Representative of the Estate of IUSKANDAR, decedent, and on behalf of the following statutory claimants individually: herself; KEVIN SUNGIARDI; and JESEN SUNGIARDI, TANIA APRILLIA, as Personal Representative of the Estate of NELLY, decedent, and on behalf of the following statutory claimants individually: herself; KEVIN SUNGIARDI; JESEN SUNGIARDI; and JULIANUR, BENEDIKTUS BEKE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of TEOFILUS LAU URA DARI, decedent, and on behalf of the following statutory claimants individually: DEMETRIA LEDEFITA ETA; DOMINIKUS LAU; and TARSISIUS PANDA. and others
Defendant: THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation and The Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash
Tetris Holding, LLC v Partnerships and unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A
as 1:2023cv04608
Plaintiff: Tetris Holding, LLC, Shanghai Li Bow trading Co., LTD and Toy Room And Baby Store
Defendant: Partnerships and unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A, 0033WEIgs48624, 1918 Global Trading Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Trias Holding AG v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03605
Plaintiff: Trias Holding AG
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Comfortable personality bag Store, Coolcept Bag Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Royer Brands International S.A.R.L. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03519
Plaintiff: Royer Brands International S.A.R.L.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Dongguan Senlinbao Cap & Hat Industrial Co., Ltd., Peeqi Boutique (Dongguan) Co,ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
General Motors LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03174
Plaintiff: General Motors LLC
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, AOLIZ Store, Auto Personality Parts-ww9 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Holder v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02734
Plaintiff: Marissa Holder
Defendant: L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Namaste Laboratories, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv02672
Plaintiff: Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, accfuns-us, canifornialife and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Casteel v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv02538
Plaintiff: Seth Casteel
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, SHAOSHAN Art Palace, KUBISNCY and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Nike, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv02308
Plaintiff: Nike, Inc.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Hunan Kangxuan Technology Co., Ltd., Yangzhou Step Toys & Gifts Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Kroll v. Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv01762
Plaintiff: Steven Kroll
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?