Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Peel et al v. Draper and Kramer Mortgage Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv00045
Plaintiff:
Tres Peel and Denise Peel
Defendant:
Draper and Kramer Mortgage Corp., Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and GMAC Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Dozier v. GMAC Mortgage LLC et al
as 1:2015cv11518
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dozier
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage LLC , Mark L Korrel and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Peel et al v. 1st Advantage Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv02404
Plaintiff:
Denise Peel and Tres Peel
Defendant:
1st Advantage Mortgage, LLC, Freddie Mac, Depositor (N/A) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peel v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv07679
Plaintiff:
Tres G. Peel
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC, Federal Home Loan Mortgage, Earnest J. Codilis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Younes v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2013cv01485
Plaintiff:
Joseph Younes
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, GMAC Mortgage, LLC, Nationwide Title Clearing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Younes v. US Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv01413
Plaintiff:
Joseph Younes
Defendant:
US Bank N.A., GMAC Mortgage, LLC, Bank of America N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv09735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv50142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Stewart v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC
as 1:2011cv07271
Plaintiff:
Robert Stewart
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
GMAC Mortgage LLC v. Kloster
as 3:2011cv50271
Plaintiff:
GMAC Mortgage LLC
Defendant:
Peter J. Kloster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
