Cases 61 - 70 of 154
Franklin v. Wise et al
as 3:2018cv01335
Defendant:
Roena Wise, Lessie Bates Davis Neighboorhood House, Reona Wise and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Franklin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bold v. R.P. Lumber Co. Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01296
Plaintiff:
Michael Bold
Defendant:
R.P. Lumber Co. Inc. , R.L.P. Development and Robert Plummer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kroboth v. Kidds Restaurants, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00519
Plaintiff:
Nathanial Kroboth
Defendant:
Kidds Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tourville v. MBR Management Corporation
as 3:2017cv00373
Plaintiff:
Jesse Tourville
Defendant:
MBR Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Collins et al v. NPC International, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00312
Plaintiff:
Tony Collins , Naimatullah Nyazee and Ann Murray
Defendant:
NPC International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reed v. Brex, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00292
Plaintiff:
Tom Reed and Michael Roy
Defendant:
Brex, Inc. , John Keeley and Kevin Floyd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Rujawitz v. ATPE, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00251
Plaintiff:
Tayler Rujawitz
Defendant:
ATPE, LLC, ATPF, Inc., Michael Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Fouche v. Preferred Pediatric Home Health Care, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01389
Plaintiff:
Malinda Fouche
Defendant:
Preferred Pediatric Home Health Care, Inc. and Jane Doss
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Owens et al v. GLH Capital Enterprise, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01109
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Owens and Chad Walters
Defendant:
GLH Capital Enterprise, Inc., M.L.K. Enterprises, L.L.C., Back Street Entertainment, L.T.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lewis v. School Directors of District No. 7, County of Madison and State of Illinois
as 3:2016cv00980
Plaintiff:
Harmon Bradley Lewis
Defendant:
School Directors of District No. 7, County of Madison and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
