Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Hager v. Asbestos Corporation LTD. et al
as 3:2013cv01324
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hager
Defendant:
Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc., Borgwagner Morse Tec, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Crane Company , Georgia Pacific, LLC , Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Crane Company , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bode v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01310
Plaintiff:
Jason Bode
Defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Ameron International Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC , Ingersoll-Rand Company , Industrial Holding Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC , Ingersoll-Rand Company , Industrial Holding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Byers et al v. Ameren Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01299
Plaintiff:
Larry Byers and Delberta Byers
Defendant:
Ameren Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc., Asbestos Corporation LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Graham et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2013cv01219
Plaintiff:
Donald Graham and Rosemary Graham
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. , Brand Insulations Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Trane U.S. Inc. , Ingersoll-Rand Company , Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Trane U.S. Inc. , A.W. Chesterton Company, Borgwarner Morse Tec Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Kirschner et al v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01207
Plaintiff:
Edward Kirschner and Eugenia Kirschner
Defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., American National Insurance Company, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. , Georgia-Pacific LLC , Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. , 3M Company, AERCO International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Gurnett et al v. AO Smith Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01206
Plaintiff:
James A. Gurnett and Mary Ann Kruger
Defendant:
AO Smith Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cross_claimant:
Trane US, Inc. , Georgia Pacific LLC , Wilsonart International, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Trane US, Inc. , AO Smith Corporation, AW Chesterton, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fanelli v. Asbestos Corporation LTD. et al
as 3:2013cv01035
Plaintiff:
William Fanelli
Defendant:
Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc., Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , Trane US, Inc. and Ingersoll-Rand Company
Cross_defendant:
Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Imo Industries, Inc. , Certainteed Corporation and RSCC Wire & Cable LLC
Counter_defendant:
Imo Industries, Inc. , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Schwindt et al v. A.B.B., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00996
Plaintiff:
Arnold Schwindt and Maritza Schwindt
Defendant:
A.B.B., Inc. , ABB Inc. , Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc and others
Cross_claimant:
Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , York International Corporation , A.B.B., Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , A.B.B., Inc. , ABB Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Douthitt et al v. Arvinmeritor, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00754
Plaintiff:
William Douthitt and Sonora Douthitt
Defendant:
Arvinmeritor, Inc., Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. , Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Addison et al v. CBS Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00397
Plaintiff:
Edgar Lee Addison and Josephine Torres Addison
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, Certaineed Corporation, Crane Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
