Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McBride v. ExpertPlan, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02680
Plaintiff:
Annamaria McBride
Defendant:
ExpertPlan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Torres v. California Casualty Management Co.
as 2:2012cv02601
Plaintiff:
Wende W. Torres
Defendant:
California Casualty Management Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jordan v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv02573
Plaintiff:
Jack R. Jordan
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation and Gary D. Forsee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vega v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
as 2:2010cv02630
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Marie Vega
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UBS Financial Services, Inc. v. Ingraham
as 2:2009cv02502
Plaintiff:
UBS Financial Services, Inc. and UBS Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Carla C. Ingraham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Taubin v. Patterson Dental
as 2:2009cv02240
Plaintiff:
Cari Taubin
Defendant:
Patterson Dental
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Ragland v. Wade et al
as 2:2009cv02008
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Ragland
Defendant:
Janelle Wade and Mount Carmel Hospital
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ragland v. University of Kansas Hospital and Medical School et al
as 2:2008cv02379
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Ragland
Defendant:
University of Kansas Hospital and Medical School, Kelly Hewins and Julie Mack
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Butler v. Consolidated Container Company, LP
as 2:2007cv02458
Plaintiff:
Jack Butler and Jack Butler
Defendant:
Consolidated Container Company, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Stevens v. Progressive Halcyon Insurance Company et al
as 2:2007cv02194
Plaintiff:
Dawn M Stevens
Defendant:
Progressive Halcyon Insurance Company and Jerry Kane
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
