Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Golf Grips Depot, Inc. et al v. Spark Funding LLC et al
as 1:2021cv06085
Plaintiff:
Golf Grips Depot, Inc. and Stanley Arnold
Defendant:
Spark Funding LLC, Amerifi Capital Inc, Yes Capital Group LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Arnold v. Lee
as 1:2021cv02096
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Arnold
Defendant:
Patricia Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MACS SNEAKER CORPORATION doing business as Sneaker Corner et al
as 1:2019cv02046
Plaintiff:
Arnold Larry Finkelstein, MACS SNEAKER CORPORATION doing business as Sneaker Corner and Carol Ellen Finkelstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nike USA, Inc. v. Macs Sneaker Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv02061
Defendant:
MACS SNEAKER CORPORATION doing business as Sneaker Corner, Arnold Larry Finkelstein, Carol Ellen Finkelstein and others
Plaintiff:
NIKE USA, INC., and Nike USA, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Jason Schneider and Fred Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Schwartzco Enterprises, LLC et al v. TMH Management, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01082
Defendant:
Thomas Brown, Meat House Franchising, LLC, Kerry Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Arnold M. Schwartz, Schwartzco Enterprises, LLC and The Meat House - Roslyn, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Delianides v. Arnold Sales Company, Inc.
as 1:2011cv04331
Defendant:
Arnold Sales Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Angelo Delianides
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Redi Fresh Produce, Inc. v. Iguazu Trading Group Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv01486
Plaintiff:
Redi Fresh Produce, Inc.
Defendant:
Iguazu Trading Group Corp., Amarilys G. Montero, Brunilda Obuhosky and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Temple Sinai of Bergen County v. Amster
as 2:2007cv02357
Plaintiff:
Temple Sinai of Bergen County
Defendant:
Arnold Amster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
