Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Smith v. Georgia Pacific Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv03875
Plaintiff:
Benjamin P. Smith
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific Corp., Georgia Pacific Corp., Michael J. Malik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Gerald v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv03339
Plaintiff:
Tenisha A. Gerald
Defendant:
United States of America, Andre P. Campbell and Darryl Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Tomaino v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv01578
Plaintiff:
Santino P. Tomaino
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Chun et al v. Dimartini
as 1:2009cv00364
Plaintiff:
Hee Jung Chun and Sung J. Chun
Defendant:
William P. Dimartini, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Maddox v. Concannon et al
as 2:2008cv02432
Plaintiff:
Pretina Maddox
Defendant:
Pat Concannon and P. Concannon Excavating
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hutchinson et al v. Pursell et al
as 1:2008cv00621
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hutchinson and Sertina Hutchinson
Defendant:
Russell P. Pursell, Jr. and Elrac, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Anderson et al v. Kaplan et al
as 1:2008cv00341
Plaintiff:
Owen P. Anderson and Winston Williams
Defendant:
Alexander Kaplan and National Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Chaikovskiy v. Toomey
as 1:2007cv05104
Plaintiff:
Dimitriy Chaikovskiy
Defendant:
Anthony P. Toomey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Habibs G. Hair and Beauty Salon, Inc. v. Poulos et al
as 1:2007cv00259
Plaintiff:
Habibs G. Hair and Beauty Salon, Inc.
Defendant:
Christine Poulos, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Lim v. Joseph et al
as 1:2007cv02425
Plaintiff:
Yoon Soon Lim
Defendant:
Roger P. Joseph and Walmart Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
