Labor/Management Relations Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Cases 71 - 80 of 207
Bove Industries, Inc. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 138, 138A, 138B and 138C et al
as 2:2016cv01003
Defendant: Dennis S. Adrian, Phil Capobianco, John Duffy and others
Plaintiff: Bove Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Trustees of the United Plant and Production Workers Local 175 Benefits Fund v. Petrillo Contracting Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00763
Defendant: Petrillo Contracting Inc., Power Concrete Co., Inc., The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Trustees of the United Plant and Production Workers Local 175 Benefits Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Local 210 Warehouse & Production Employees Union, AFL-CIO et al v. Environmental Services, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00756
Counter Claimant: Environmental Services, Inc.
Defendant: Environmental Services, Inc.
Counter Defendant: Local 210 Warehouse & Production Employees Union, AFL-CIO, Trustees of the Local 210 Unity Pension Fund and Trustees of the Local 210 Unity Welfare Fund
Plaintiff: Local 210 Warehouse & Production Employees Union, AFL-CIO, Trustees of the Local 210 Unity Pension Fund and Trustees of the Local 210 Unity Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
New York City & Vicinity District Council of Carpenters v. J.M.R. Concrete Corporation, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00711
Respondent: J.M.R. Concrete Corporation, Inc.
Petitioner: New York City & Vicinity District Council of Carpenters
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
New York City and Vicinity District Council of Carpenters v. J.M.R. Concrete Corporation, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00711
Respondent: J.M.R. Concrete Corporation, Inc.
Petitioner: New York City and Vicinity District Council of Carpenters
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Local Union No. 1 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada v. Recine & Sons Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00599
Petitioner: Local Union No. 1 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada
Respondent: Recine & Sons Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Local Union No. 1 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada v. P.A.C. Heating, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00547
Petitioner: Local Union No. 1 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada
Respondent: P.A.C. Heating, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Local Union No. 1 of the United Association of Journeyman and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada v. Bissetta & List, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00516
Defendant: Bissetta & List, Inc.
Plaintiff: Local Union No. 1 of the United Association of Journeyman and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
New York City & Vicinity District Council of Carpenters v. Kafka Construction, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00193
Respondent: Kafka Construction, Inc.
Petitioner: New York City & Vicinity District Council of Carpenters
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Ramsawak v. Gateway Security Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06783
Defendant: Gateway Security Inc. and Local 74, United Service Workers Union, IUJAT
Plaintiff: Suresh Ramsawak
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?