Cases 21 - 28 of 28
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. M/Y Fortuna et al
as 2:2011cv02514
Defendant:
Neil Goodman and M/Y Fortuna
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Picini et al v. Chase Home Finance LLC et al
as 2:2011cv02393
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance LLC and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Picini, Jr. and Michele Picini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Begum et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv02014
Plaintiff:
Shanaz Begum, Alex Lam and Tamara Williams
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Milano v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2009cv04087
Plaintiff:
Michael Milano
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Ginni Filaments Limited v. Capital Supply Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv03121
Plaintiff:
Ginni Filaments Limited
Defendant:
Capital Supply Corp., Elliot Rindenow, Washington Mutual Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
NEI Worldwide Graphics, Ltd. v. RCA Capital Corp. et al
as 2:2009cv02443
Plaintiff:
NEI Worldwide Graphics, Ltd.
Defendant:
RCA Capital Corp., JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Muhammad v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2008cv00717
Plaintiff:
Rafeak Muhammad
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Guideone Specialty Mutual Insurance Company v. JP Morgan Chase Bank & Co. et al
as 1:2007cv04850
Plaintiff:
Guideone Specialty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank & Co. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
