Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sawyer et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04303
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, US, Inc
Plaintiff:
Nancy Sawyer and John Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sawyer et al v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03938
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Neal Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Keune et al v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02049
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Ames, Lee N. Barber, Andrew Benincasa and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Propecia Finasteride Product Liability Litigation
as 1:2012md02331
Plaintiff:
Michael Pollard, Ralph Cavallo, Valerie L. Hill-Jackson and others
Defendant:
John Canan, Camber Pharmaceuticals Inc, New Hair Institute Medical Group and others
Interested Party:
Dr. Julianne Imperato-McGinley
In Re:
Propecia Finasteride Product Liability Litigation
Special Master:
Hon. Arthur J. Boylan, Ret.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sawyer v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv05458
Plaintiff:
Linda Sawyer
Defendant:
Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Anderson et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 1:2008cv01942
Plaintiff:
Derrick Anderson, Derrick Anderson, Derrick Anderson and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly and Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Schoer v. A.J. Pegno Construction Corp/Tully Construction Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03759
Plaintiff:
Mark Schoer
Defendant:
A.J. Pegno Construction Corp/Tully Construction Co. Inc., A.J. Pegno Construction Corp., Tully Construction Co. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
