Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Tyson et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06847
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Depuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Tyson and Gustavus Tyson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tyson et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv06847
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Depuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Tyson and Gustavus Tyson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nesbitt v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05685
Defendant:
Depuy International Limited, Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Depuy Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arama v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00205
Plaintiff:
Israel Arama
Defendant:
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Ethicon, Inc.,, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Serraty v. DePuy Orthopaedic, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv07326
Defendant:
DePuy Inc.,, DePuy Orthopaedic, Inc., Depuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Serraty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05924
Defendant:
DePuy Inc.,, DePuy International LTD, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Evans v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv04869
Defendant:
DePuy Inc.,, Depuy International Limited, Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Newman et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01731
Plaintiff:
Steven Brill and Elaine Newman
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
