Cases 31 - 40 of 262
Klein v. FMA Alliance, Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv01516
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and FMA Alliance, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Alexander Klein
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01526
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Blumenfeld v. GC Services Limited Partnership et al
as 1:2021cv01394
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and GC Services Limited Partnership
Plaintiff:
Ruchel Blumenfeld
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01323
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01230
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Goldstein v. Continental Service Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01171
Plaintiff:
Chana Goldstein
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Continental Service Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01026
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garellek v. Midland Credit Management, Inc et al
as 1:2021cv00988
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Midland Credit Management, Inc
Plaintiff:
Akiva Garellek
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Klein v. Southwest Credit Systems, L.P. et al
as 1:2021cv00866
Defendant:
Southwest Credit Systems, L.P. and John Does 1-25
Plaintiff:
Avigdor Klein
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
