Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02403
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01449
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lin et al v. Shanghai Original, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00886
Defendant:
Cheng Kueng Liu, John Zhang, Lillian Liou and others
Plaintiff:
Jian Ying Lin, Xin He and Hui Qiu Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Crupnick v. Interpret LLC et al
as 2:2017cv07018
Defendant:
Michael Cai, Interpret LLC, Grant Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Russ Crupnick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Crupnick v. Interpret LLC et al
as 1:2017cv07018
Defendant:
Michael Cai, Interpret LLC, Grant Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Russ Crupnick
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Liu v. DSM Laundromat Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06648
Defendant:
Ding Yin Yu, John Doe Corp., DSM Laundromat Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cai Ling Liu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lin v. Joe Japanese Buffet Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03435
Defendant:
Zhao Lin Chen, Cherry Blossom Buffet Inc., John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jian Hui Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
