Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Washington et al v. Rivas-Ramos
as 1:2022cv07482
Plaintiff:
SHAQUANA WASHINGTON and ROBERT ADAMS
Defendant:
PEDRO RIVAS-RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Washington v. Rosario et al
as 1:2016cv06064
Plaintiff:
Ayiesha Washington
Defendant:
Carlos Rosario and Toyota Lease Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Birt v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv07878
Plaintiff:
Frances D. Birt
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation , Aramark Food Service Corporation , Indar Ramesar Nanhoo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Washington et al v. Reliable Van LLC et al
as 1:2015cv02257
Plaintiff:
Crescent Washington and Bonita R. Grady
Defendant:
Reliable Van LLC , Citysights LLC and "John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv06584
Plaintiff:
Lynne Washington
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp. and Indar Ramesar Nanhoo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1349
Washington et al v. National Freight Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv04566
Plaintiff:
Jamal R. Washington and Paul Washington, SR
Defendant:
National Freight Inc. and Joseph M. Boor, JR
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Washington et al
as 7:2007cv10336
Plaintiff:
Depaul Washington, Denice Antwine and Latara Antwine
Defendant:
National Freight Corporation and Joseph M. Boor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Notice of Removal
Washington et al
as 1:2007cv10336
Plaintiff:
Depaul Washington, Denice Antwine and Latara Antwine
Defendant:
National Freight Corporation and Joseph M. Boor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Notice of Removal
Washington et al v. Cookson et al
as 1:2007cv00203
Petitioner:
Darlene Washington and Louis Washington
Respondent:
James A. Cookson and McLaughlin Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
