Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Komorek et al v. Conflict International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09467
Plaintiff:
Stephen Komorek and API International Consulting Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Conflict International, Inc., Michael LaCorte and Andrew McLaren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Mason v. Themarysue, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv07341
Plaintiff:
Jessica Mason
Defendant:
TheMarySue, LLC, Gamurs, Inc., Trinet HR III, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Anderson v. ABC Phones of North Carolina, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08118
Plaintiff:
Andrew Anderson
Defendant:
ABC Phones of North Carolina, Inc. and ABC Phones of NC Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calegari v. Cogan et al
as 1:2016cv08799
Plaintiff:
Eunice Calegari
Defendant:
Andrew Cogan and Lori Finkel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Janus et Cie v. Kahnke
as 1:2012cv07201
Plaintiff:
Janus et Cie
Defendant:
Andrew Kahnke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yarumian v. Karpus Management, Inc.
as 1:2012cv06949
Plaintiff:
Z. Andrew Yarumian
Defendant:
Karpus Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gegare et al v. Hoffa et al
as 1:2011cv03980
Plaintiff:
Fred Gegare , Steve LLoyd , Tim Dubois and others
Defendant:
James Phillip Hoffa and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jennifer Kim v. Goldberg, Weprin, Finkel Goldstein, LLP et al
as 1:2010cv06101
Plaintiff:
Ji Sun Jennifer Kim
Defendant:
Goldberg, Weprin, Finkel Goldstein, LLP, Barry Zweigbaum, Arnold Mazel and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Clarke v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
as 1:2010cv04674
Plaintiff:
Andrew Clarke
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arnold v. Beth Abraham Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv07932
Plaintiff:
Andrew Arnold
Defendant:
Beth Abraham Health Services, Inc., Yoni Kono, Maureen Connolly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
