Cases 61 - 70 of 7,868
Herriman v. The PepsiCo INC. Disability Plan et al
as 7:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Leea Herriman
Defendant:
The PepsiCo INC. Disability Plan and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Teamsters Local 456 Pension, Health & Welfare, Annuity, Education & Training, Industry Advancement and Legal Services Funds et al v. M. Chiulli Industries LLC et al
as 7:2023cv11198
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local 456 Pension, Health & Welfare, Annuity, Education & Training, Industry Advancement and Legal Services Funds, Louis A. Picani, Joseph Sansone and others
Defendant:
M. Chiulli Industries LLC and Anthony Chiulli
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.: Delinquent Contributions
Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund et al v. Vestar, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Vestar, Inc. and John Maguire
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.: Delinquent Contributions
D'Antona v. Morgan Stanley et al
as 7:2023cv10763
Plaintiff:
D'Antona G. Gaetano and Gaetano G. D'Antona
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Manny Pastreich et al v. USP Holdings L.L.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Manny Pastreich, as Trustee, The Trustees of the Building Service 32BJ Health Fund and Manny Pastreich
Defendant:
USP Holdings L.L.C. doing business as USP Security doing business as USP Parking LLC and U Street Parking Inc. doing business as USP Security doing business as USP Parking LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Tri-State Concrete Polishing LLC et al
as 1:2023cv10906
Plaintiff:
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund and Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York
Defendant:
Tri-State Concrete Polishing LLC, Southwest Concrete Polishing, Inc., Phoenix Finishing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Alston v Enterprise 83rd Street Parking, LLC
as 1:2023cv11185
Plaintiff:
Trustee Fred Alston
Defendant:
Enterprise 83rd Street Parking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.: Delinquent Contributions
Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund et al v. Kasselman Electric Co., Inc.
as 1:2023cv10603
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund, Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Annuity Fund, Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Finishing Trades Institute and others
Defendant:
Kasselman Electric Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund et al v. Dame Contracting Inc.
as 7:2023cv11013
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund, Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Annuity Fund, Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Finishing Trades Institute and others
Defendant:
Dame Contracting Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Kowal Ruggiero et al
as 7:2023cv10610
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Judith Kowal Ruggiero, Regine Bouchereau and Kereen Tompkins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
