Cases 101 - 110 of 276
Juju, Inc. v. Campbell et al
as 1:2018cv05225
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Schollmeyer, II, 1-10 John Doe Corporations, Christopher L. Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Juju, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Rottenstein v. ARS National Services, Inc. et al
as 7:2018cv04453
Plaintiff:
Esther Rottenstein
Defendant:
ARS National Services, Inc. and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hochauser v. United Collection Bureau, Inc. et al
as 7:2018cv04454
Plaintiff:
Yochanan Hochauser
Defendant:
United Collection Bureau, Inc. and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rottenstein v. MRS BPO, L.L.C. et al
as 7:2018cv04455
Plaintiff:
Esther Rottenstein
Defendant:
MRS BPO, L.L.C. and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lauria v. Major World Chevrolet, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv04456
Plaintiff:
Angelo Lauria
Defendant:
Major World Chevrolet, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32701
Esther Gluck v. William C. Grossman Law, PLLC et al
as 1:2018cv03206
Plaintiff:
Esther Gluck
Defendant:
William C. Grossman Law, PLLC, Cavalry SPV I, LLC and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
City of Mount Vernon v. Davis et al
as 7:2018cv03007
Defendant:
Ernest D Davis , Maureen Walker , Jaime Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
City of Mount Vernon and City of Mount Vernon Urban Renewal Agency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Judge v. Valentine & Kebartas, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02780
Plaintiff:
Ebony Judge
Defendant:
Valentine & Kebartas, LLC, LVNV Funding LLC and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ebanks v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02783
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Ebanks
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shabazz v. Capital Management Services, L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv01079
Plaintiff:
Yaasmiyn Shabazz
Defendant:
Capital Management Services, L.P. and John Does l-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
