Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Biton et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv02992
Plaintiff:
Chana Biton and Sasson Biton
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lee v. Qurantillo et al
as 1:2007cv02904
Plaintiff:
Ju-Mu Lee
Defendant:
Andrea J. Qurantillo, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Ashtiany v. Upchurch et al
as 1:2007cv02362
Plaintiff:
Mohsen Ashtiany
Defendant:
Evelyn Upchurch, Emilio T. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zhou v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv01804
Plaintiff:
Li Zhou
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and Robert S. Mueller, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Zhao v. Mueller et al
as 7:2007cv01442
Plaintiff:
Qi Zhao
Defendant:
Robert S. Mueller, III, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Laptev v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv01316
Plaintiff:
Andrei B. Laptev
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Mary Ann Gantner and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Amari v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00626
Plaintiff:
Saleh Al Amari
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Alomari v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00628
Plaintiff:
Akram Abdul Aziz Alomari
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Kiarash v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00010
Plaintiff:
Kian Kiarash
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
