Cases 41 - 50 of 140
Wohr v. Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
as 1:2018cv08418
Defendant:
Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Wohr
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Rayner v. Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
as 1:2018cv08302
Defendant:
Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
Plaintiff:
Jeff Rayner
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Rudkowski v. Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
as 1:2018cv07710
Plaintiff:
Lukasz Rudkowski
Defendant:
Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Torres v. Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
as 1:2018cv07595
Defendant:
Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Torres
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Polaris Images Corporation v. Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
as 1:2018cv05115
Plaintiff:
Polaris Images Corporation
Defendant:
Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Lee v. Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
as 1:2018cv03922
Plaintiff:
Jackson Lee
Defendant:
Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wolman v. Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
as 1:2018cv03272
Plaintiff:
Baron Wolman
Defendant:
Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Polaris Images Corporation v. Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
as 1:2018cv01013
Plaintiff:
Polaris Images Corporation
Defendant:
Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Mute First Ring Ltd. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00725
Defendant:
LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A. Inc. and LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mute First Ring Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Otto v. Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
as 1:2018cv00338
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Otto
Defendant:
Associated Newspapers (U.S.A.) Limited
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
