Cases 11 - 20 of 304
Wang v. Tabula Rasa Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08829
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Tabula Rasa Healthcare, Inc., Michael Purcell, Brian Adams and others
Scott v. Tabula Rasa Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08789
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Tabula Rasa Healthcare, Inc., Michael Purcell, Brian Adams and others
O'Dell v. Tabula Rasa Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08653
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Tabula Rasa Healthcare, Inc., Assistant DA Michael Purcell, Brian Adams and others
Boyce v. Spruce Power Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv08591
Plaintiff:
Toby Boyce
Defendant:
Jonathan J. Ledecky, Brian Piern, Thomas J. Hynes III and others
Nominal Defendant:
Spruce Power Holding Corporation
Zappia v. Chase Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv08411
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zappia
Defendant:
Chase Corporation, Peter R. Chase, Mary Claire Chase and others
Turner v. Jonas
as 1:2023cv08349
Petitioner:
Sophie Belinda Turner
Respondent:
Joseph Adam Jonas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McDaniel v. Chase Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv08064
Plaintiff:
Richard McDaniel
Defendant:
Chase Corporation, Peter R. Chase, Mary Claire Chase and others
Wang v. Chase Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv07953
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Chase Corporation, Peter R. Chase, Mary Claire Chase and others
Sherman v. Cottonwood Vending LLC et al
as 1:2023cv07940
Plaintiff:
Adam Sherman, ADAM SHERMAN, individually and derivatively on behalf of COTTONWOOD VENDING LLC and ADAM SHERMAN, derivatively on behalf of COTTONWOOD VENDING LLC
Defendant:
Aniello Zampella and Coindado LLC
Nominal Defendant:
Cottonwood Vending LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
O'Dell v. Chase Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv07744
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Chase Corporation, Peter R. Chase, Mary Claire Chase and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
