Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Rosario Munoz v. Abreu et al
as 1:2013cv04055
Plaintiff:
Anyelina Rosario Munoz
Defendant:
Edwar Lizandro Abreu and Antonia Abreu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Palumbo et al
as 1:2013mc00101
Plaintiff:
Mark Palumbo , Rosario Prato , John Aquista and others
Defendant:
Anthony Fasulo, Albert Alimena, Dominick Agostino and others
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Rosarios v. HotUSA S.A. Argentina et al
as 1:2013mc00060
Plaintiff:
Andres Dario Rosarios
Defendant:
HotUSA S.A. Argentina et al
Cause Of Action: M 10-7 Letters Rogatory - Argentina
Frederick v. New York City Housing Authority et al
as 1:2012cv01155
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Frederick
Defendant:
New York City Housing Authority, New York City Health and Hospital Corporation, Coler-Goldwater Hospital & Nursing Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv08720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv02143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rosario v. Potter
as 7:2007cv05891
Plaintiff:
Gladys Rosario
Defendant:
John E. Potter and Paul Hogrogian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Broadway Riverdale Meat Market Corp. et al v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv03319
Plaintiff:
Broadway Riverdale Meat Market Corp. and Gustavo A. Rosario
Defendant:
The United States of America, The United States Department of Agriculture and Ed Schafer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Rosario Veiga v. World Meteorological Organisation et al
as 1:2007cv03182
Plaintiff:
Maria do Rosario Veiga
Defendant:
World Meteorological Organisation, Michel Jarraud, Jorge Cortes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
