Cases 21 - 30 of 104
O'Dell v. Duke Realty Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv06425
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Duke Realty Corporation, James B. Connor, David P. Stockert and others
Sommese v. Steel Connect, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06355
Plaintiff:
Robert Sommese
Defendant:
Steel Connect, Inc., Warren G. Lichtenstein, Glen M. Kassan and others
Vega v. Energy Transfer LP et al
as 1:2022cv04614
Plaintiff:
Mike Vega
Defendant:
Energy Transfer LP, Kelcy L. Warren, Thomas E. Long and others
Tiso v. Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03804
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tiso
Defendant:
Healthcare Trust of America, Inc., W. Bradley Blair, II, Vicki U. Booth and others
Warren v. Ebay, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03524
Defendant:
Oldboombox, Ebay, Inc., Jamie Lannone and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Warren
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (a) False representation of goods sold in interstate commerce
Warren v. ARS Account Resolution
as 1:2022cv02963
Plaintiff:
Gregory Warren
Defendant:
ARS Account Resolution
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stein v. Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03703
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
HEALTHCARE TRUST OF AMERICA, INC., W. Bradley Blair, II, Vicki U. Booth and others
IN RE: IBM ARBITRATION AGREEMENT LITIGATION
as 1:2021cv06296
Plaintiff:
William Chastka
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mark Guerinot, william abt, Brian Brown and others
Amicus Curiae:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj
Warren v. International Business Machines Corp.
as 1:2021cv06353
Plaintiff:
James Warren
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj
Lhamon v. Cardtronics PLC et al
as 1:2021cv03448
Defendant:
Rahul Gupta, Patrick Phillips, Mark Rossi and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Lhamon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
