Cases 31 - 40 of 197
Carter v. Resolute Forest Products Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07466
Plaintiff:
James Carter
Defendant:
Resolute Forest Products Inc., Duncan K. Davies, Bradley P. Martin and others
Bell v. Catchmark Timber Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06548
Plaintiff:
Richard Bell
Defendant:
Catchmark Timber Trust, Inc., Douglas D. Rubenstein, Tim E. Bentsen and others
Donoghue v. iTeos Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04732
Plaintiff:
Deborah Donoghue
Defendant:
Aaron I. Davis, Joe Lewis, Boxer Capital, LLC and others
Nominal Defendant:
iTeos Therapeutics, Inc.
Stein v. Tivity Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03832
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Tivity Health, Inc., Richard Ashworth, Anthony M. Sanfilippo and others
Smith v. Tivity Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04665
Plaintiff:
Edward Smith
Defendant:
Tivity Health, Inc., Richard M. Ashworth, Anthony M. Sanfilippo and others
Higley v. BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01658
Plaintiff:
Denver Higley
Defendant:
BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc., Todd C. Davis, Peter S. Greenleaf and others
Strouth v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv01055
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STROUTH
Defendant:
Greg C. Garland, Phillips 66 Partners LP, Gary Adams and others
Sanford v. BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01676
Plaintiff:
Richard Sanford
Defendant:
BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc., Peter S. Greenleaf, Jeffrey A. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Stein v. BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01600
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc., Peter S. Greenleaf, Jeffrey A. Bailey and others
Verschleiser v. Frydman et al
as 1:2022cv00601
Plaintiff:
Eli Verschleiser
Defendant:
Jacob Frydman, Lanny Davis, Craig Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
