Cases 31 - 40 of 197
Donoghue v. iTeos Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04732
Plaintiff:
Deborah Donoghue
Defendant:
Aaron I. Davis, Joe Lewis, Boxer Capital, LLC and others
Nominal Defendant:
iTeos Therapeutics, Inc.
Smith v. Tivity Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04665
Plaintiff:
Edward Smith
Defendant:
Tivity Health, Inc., Richard M. Ashworth, Anthony M. Sanfilippo and others
Stein v. Tivity Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03832
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Tivity Health, Inc., Richard Ashworth, Anthony M. Sanfilippo and others
Higley v. BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01658
Plaintiff:
Denver Higley
Defendant:
BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc., Todd C. Davis, Peter S. Greenleaf and others
Sanford v. BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01676
Plaintiff:
Richard Sanford
Defendant:
BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc., Peter S. Greenleaf, Jeffrey A. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Stein v. BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01600
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc., Peter S. Greenleaf, Jeffrey A. Bailey and others
Strouth v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv01055
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STROUTH
Defendant:
Greg C. Garland, Phillips 66 Partners LP, Gary Adams and others
Verschleiser v. Frydman et al
as 1:2022cv00601
Plaintiff:
Eli Verschleiser
Defendant:
Jacob Frydman, Lanny Davis, Craig Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Amato et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2021cv10239
Plaintiff:
Nicole Amato, Barry Amundson, Najat Arsenault and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Kirvens LLC et al
as 1:2021cv10140
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Kirvens LLC doing business as Kirvens, Marisa Joy Davis-Kaimanovich and Steven Evans Weinles
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
