Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Yadav et al v. Punj et al
as 1:2011cv01500
Plaintiff:
Ranvir Yadav , Veena Yadav , Priyanka Yadav and others
Defendant:
Rajeev Punj, Rosenthal Collins Group, LLC , UBS Financial Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America v. Buy-A-Home, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv09280
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Buy-A-Home, LLC, Metropolitan Housing, LLC, Gramercy Funding Group Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tarlowe et al v. New York City Board of Education et al
as 1:2007cv07936
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Tarlowe and Seth Jonas
Defendant:
New York City Board of Education and Joel Klein
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
In Re: Merrill Lynch & Co., et al v. , et al
as 1:2002md01484
Lead Plaintiff:
John Kilgour Lentell, Arash Saffarnia, Steven Roth and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Conte, Rosalae Sasson, Robert Griffin and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Shubhro Sen, Mary Sen, Joan Markowitz and others
Petitioner:
E. Powell Miller, Lowell Strate, Georgiana Strate and others
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc., Henry Blodget, Merrill Lynch Internet Strategies Fund, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Susan Lockshine and Gary Bauer
Consolidated Defendant:
Princeton Funds Distributor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In Re: Merrill Lynch & Co., et al v. , et al
as 1:2021mc00096
Plaintiff:
Jerry Conte, Rosalae Sasson, Robert Griffin and others
Petitioner:
E. Powell Miller, Lowell Strate, Georgiana Strate and others
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc., Henry Blodget, Merrill Lynch Internet Strategies Fund, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
