Cases 81 - 90 of 29,152
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv04023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
National Labor Relations Board v. Stephens Media Group-Watertown, LLC
as 1:2024mc00190
Cause Of Action: M 36 National Labor Relations Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv03988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America et al v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03973
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Arizona, State of, Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and Ticketmaster L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Access Now v. United States Customs and Border Protection
as 1:2024cv03979
Plaintiff:
Access Now
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Access Now v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 1:2024cv03980
Plaintiff:
Access Now
Defendant:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Leifer v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03994
Plaintiff:
Abraham Leifer
Defendant:
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and Ticketmaster L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Coinbase, Inc. v. Moon
as 1:2024cv03969
Plaintiff:
Coinbase, Inc.
Defendant:
Karen Moon
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Covered Bridge Outdoor Construction Corporation v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv03965
Plaintiff:
Covered Bridge Outdoor Construction Corporation
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
