Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Globokar v. Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01723
Plaintiff:
William Globokar
Defendant:
Hess Corporation, James H. Quigley, Terrence J. Checki and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Diaz et al v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2022cv02051
Plaintiff:
Lydia Gonzalez Diaz, Vanessa Walsh, Nina Crawford and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, New York City Housing Authority, Harlem River Preservation LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1437 U.S. Housing Act of 1937
Teifke v. Goodrich Petroleum Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10693
Plaintiff:
Christine M. Teifke
Defendant:
Goodrich Petroleum Corporation, Walter G. Goodrich, Robert C. Turnham, Jr. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Thompson v. Goodrich Petroleum Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10481
Plaintiff:
Michael Thompson
Defendant:
Goodrich Petroleum Corporation, Walter G. Goodrich, Robert C. Turnham, Jr. and others
Whitfield v. Goodrich Petroleum Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv10449
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Goodrich Petroleum Corp., Walter G. Goodrich, Robert C. Turnham, Jr. and others
Amato et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2021cv10239
Plaintiff:
Nicole Amato, Barry Amundson, Najat Arsenault and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Whitfield v. MGM Growth Properties LLC et al
as 1:2021cv08110
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
MGM Growth Properties LLC, Paul Salem, Thomas Roberts and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
