Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Woldanski v. TuSimple Holdings, Inc. et al.
as 1:2022cv09625
Plaintiff:
PATRICK WOLDANSKI
Defendant:
TUSIMPLE HOLDINGS, INC., CHENG LU, PATRICK DILLON and others
Petitioner:
George Maurizi, Guy Donald Foulkes, Ronald Betsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
New Concept Energy, Inc. v. Gentile et al
as 1:2018cv08896
Defendant:
Guy Gentile and MintBroker International, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
New Concept Energy, Inc.
Interested Party:
Igal Wizman, Eleanor Fisher, EY Bahamas Ltd. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Demaree et al v. Castro et al
as 1:2022cv08772
Plaintiff:
Matthew Demaree, Alex Yohn, Berenger Lieber and others
Defendant:
Thomas Castro, Cyril Polizzi, Quentin Detraux and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Giddings v. Sprague Resources LP et al
as 1:2022cv06354
Plaintiff:
Mark Giddings
Defendant:
Sprague Resources LP, Sprague Resources GP, LLC, Stephen M. Hendel and others
Davidman v. RADA Electronic Industries Limited et al
as 1:2022cv06899
Plaintiff:
Pinchas Davidman
Defendant:
RADA Electronic Industries Limited, Yassi Ben Shalom, Guy Zur and others
Prometo Produce Corp. v. Produce Depot USA LLC et al
as 1:2021cv06131
Defendant:
Gaetano Balzano, Produce Depot USA LLC, Guy Balzano and others
Plaintiff:
Prometo Produce Corp.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Brady v. GW Pharmaceuticals, PLC et al
as 1:2021cv02382
Defendant:
David Gryska, Catherine Mackey, William Waldegrave and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brady
Hinton v. GW Pharmaceuticals, PLC et al
as 1:2021cv02379
Defendant:
David Gryska, Catherine Mackey, William Waldegrave and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Hinton
Coffman v. Loral Space & Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04007
Defendant:
Arthur L. Simon, Loral Space & Communications, Inc., John P. Stenbit and others
Plaintiff:
Guy Coffman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
