Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv03929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Rotberg v. The Home Depot, Inc.
as 1:2016cv02959
Plaintiff:
Tzvee Rotberg
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
The Home Depot, Inc. et al v. Army Aviation Center Federal Credit Union
as 1:2016mc00026
Plaintiff:
The Home Depot, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Army Aviation Center Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Quash
Fernandez v. Rust-Oleum Corporation et al
as 7:2014cv08857
Plaintiff:
Ulbardo Fernandez
Defendant:
Rust-Oleum Corporation , Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Pregis Innovative Packaging Inc. v. Home Depot U.S.A, Inc.
as 1:2014mc00130
Plaintiff:
Pregis Innovative Packaging Inc.
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A, Inc.
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Eskinazi et al v. The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, Inc. et al
as 7:2012cv04787
Plaintiff:
Gwen Eskinazi and Stacy D. Lonardo
Defendant:
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, Inc., The Scotts Company LLC, The Home Depot, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Eskinazi et al v. The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04787
Plaintiff:
Gwen Eskinazi and Stacy D. Lonardo
Defendant:
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, Inc., The Scotts Company LLC, The Home Depot, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
In re: Scotts EZ Seed Litigation
as 7:2012cv04727
Plaintiff:
Michael Arcuri , David A. Browne , Lance Moore and others
Defendant:
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, Inc. , The Scotts Company LLC , The Home Depot, Inc. and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Gwen Eskinazi and Stacy D. Lonardo
Consolidated_defendant:
True Value Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
