Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Dodson et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv01189
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dodson, Nannie Dunbar, Colleen Dunwoody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association v. Bronx 741-743 Hunts Point Avenue L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv10796
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, on Behalf of the Registered Holders of SBALR Commercial Mortgage 2020-RR1 Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2020-RR1 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Bronx 741-743 Hunts Point Avenue L.P., Bronx 801 Freeman Street L.P., Isaac Kassirer and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Bronx 1202 Spofford Avenue L.P., Bronx 444 East 187th Street L.P., Bronx 441 East 187th Street L.P. and others
Receiver:
Ian Lagowitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Able et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv02872
Plaintiff:
Luke Able, Gilbert Ackerson, Destiny Alger and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Fogarty et al v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey et al
as 1:2017cv07134
Plaintiff:
Enid Zentelis and Sean Fogarty , Conell Harris , Octavius Fraser and others
Defendant:
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey , The 3M Company and Tyco Fire Products, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
1st Bridge LLC v. The William Lee Freeman Garden Apartments LLC et al
as 1:2010cv03191
Plaintiff:
1st Bridge LLC
Defendant:
The William Lee Freeman Garden Apartments LLC, Workers Compensation Board Of New York State, Lee & Associates Architects PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
