Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Von Lane v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02961
Plaintiff:
Shamara Von Lane
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer Oy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 7:2016cv02342
Plaintiff:
Bridgett Lane
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc , Bayer Oy and Bayer Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greenfield v. Melvyn J. Estrin & Associates et al
as 1:2012cv00343
Plaintiff:
Peter Greenfield
Defendant:
Melvyn J. Estrin & Associates, Melvyn Jay Estrin, P.C., Patrick G. Benn & Associates P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Metro et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2009cv09430
Plaintiff:
Lane Metro and Nancy Metro
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act
Cardenas et al v. 233 Broadway Owners, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00681
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cardenas and Edith Cardenas
Defendant:
233 Broadway Owners, LLC, 59 Maiden Lane Associates, LLC., 63 Wall Street Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Zygmunt et al v. 59 Maiden Lane Associates,LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00679
Plaintiff:
Mieczyslaw Zygmunt and Roza Zygmunt
Defendant:
59 Maiden Lane Associates,LLC, 90 Church Street Limited Partnership Abatement Professionals, Abscope Environmental, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kwasnik v. 160 Water Street, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv11291
Plaintiff:
Waldyslaw Kwasnik
Defendant:
160 Water Street, Inc., 160 Water Street Associates, 59 Maiden Lane Associates, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act
Kopcza v. 101 Barclay Street et al
as 1:2007cv05396
Plaintiff:
Michal Kopcza
Defendant:
101 Barclay Street, The Bank of New York Company, Inc., One Wall Street Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
