Torts - Injury Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Cases 11 - 20 of 79
Nocelli et al v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01980
Plaintiff: Mrs. Anna Nocelli, Guido Nocelli and Anna Nocelli
Defendant: KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., Fidelity Capital Inc., Weyerhauser Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Keating, Jr. v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv12258
Defendant: Foster Wheeler, LLC, Gardner Denver, Inc., Industry Products Co. and others
Plaintiff: FRANCIS J. KEATING and Francis J. Keating, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
KEATING v. Air & Liquid Systems Coproration et al
as 1:2018cv10439
Defendant: Foster Wheeler LLC, Gardner Denver, Inc., Spirax Sarco, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: FRANCIS J. KEATING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Minassian et al v. Brenntag North America et al
as 1:2018cv09708
Petitioner: Whitaker Clark & Daniels, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to AMerican Talc Company, Inc., Metropolitan Talc Company, Inc., Charles Mathieu, Inc. and Resource Processors, Inc.
Defendant: Imerys Talc America, Inc., Brenntag Specialties Inc. as a successor-in-interest to Mineral Pigment Solutions, Inc., as as successor-in-interest to Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc., Brenntag North America and others
Plaintiff: Elaine Minassian and Donald Minassian
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Whittaker Clark & Daniels, Inc., as successor-in-interest to American Talc Company, Metropolitan Talc Company, Inc., Charles Mathieu, Inc, and Resource Processors, Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Windsor Minerals, Inc., JOHN DOE 1 through JOHN DOE 75 (fictitious) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Henderson v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2018cv02307
Plaintiff: Robert Henderson
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company, Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant: Crane Co.
Cross_defendant: Crane Co. , 84 Lumber Company, Ace Hardware Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Henderson v. 84 Lumber Co. et al
as 1:2018cv02240
Plaintiff: Robert Henderson
Defendant: 84 Lumber Co., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Donohue et al v. CBS Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv07232
Defendant: CBS Corporation , ABB, Inc. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Michael B Donohue and Anne Donohue
Debtor: Viking Pump Inc. and The City Of New York
Cross_claimant: Flowserve US Inc. , Crane Co. and Carrier Corporation
Cross_defendant: Flowserve US Inc. , ABB, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark v. Advanced Composites Group, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv06422
Defendant: Advanced Composites Group , AII Acquisitions LLC, AWC1997 Corporation and others
Plaintiff: John Clark and Michele Clark
Cross_claimant: Parker-Hannifin Corporation , Lennox Industries Inc. , Mine Safety Appliance Company and others
Cross_defendant: AII Acquisitions LLC, AWC1997 Corporation , Advanced Composites Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Greenland v. Philip Morris USA Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02910
Defendant: Philip Morris USA Inc., RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Jordan Greenland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCarthy et al v. CBS Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv00793
Plaintiff: Francis McCarthy and Anne McCarthy
Defendant: CBS Corporation , General Electric Complany, et al. , Georgia-Pacific LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?