Cases 81 - 86 of 86
Sanchez v. Dallas et al
as 1:2008cv00055
Plaintiff:
Juan Sanchez
Defendant:
Wesley Smith Dallas, Wesley Smith Dallas, Clinton Dorris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Munoz et al v. Verizon New York, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv08722
Plaintiff:
Hernan Munoz and Ebelly Sanchez
Defendant:
Verizon New York, Inc., Verizon Properties, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Sanchez et al v. 100 Church, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv08286
Plaintiff:
Delta E. Sanchez and Filemon M. Rojas
Defendant:
100 Church, LLC, 80 Lafayette Associates, LLC, 90 Church Street Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act
Sanchez et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv04005
Defendant:
The City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., Bechtel Environmental, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Sanchez and Maureen Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act
Sanchez v. Augustin et al
as 1:2007cv02586
Plaintiff:
Adam Sanchez
Defendant:
Mario Augustin, Mario Augustin, Mario Augustin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In Re: Air Crash at Belle Harbor, New York on November 12, 2001
as 1:2002md01448
Plaintiff:
Catherine Noboa, Aristoteles Savinon, Julio Savinon and others
Defendant:
Airbus Industrie, GIE, American Airlines, Inc., Airbus Industrie S.A.S. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Maria Teresa Heuze, Emilia Muradian Melikjanian, Freddy Rafael De Marchena and others
Appellant:
Yanet Dishmey Rosario De George
Petitioner:
Maria Gisela Ledesma, Luis Emilio Santos, Mamerta Perez and others
Respondent:
Pablo Pedro Munoz
Claimant:
Domingo Espinal
3Rd Party Defendant:
Airbus Industrie, G.I.E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 al
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
