Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Daniel J. Ventricelli v. S.N. et al
as 7:2020cv00436
Defendant:
William T. Nicklin and S.N.
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Ventricelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ac
Pride Technologies, LLC v. Khublall
as 1:2019cv11315
Plaintiff:
Pride Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Khublall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Li v. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. et al
as 1:2019cv11629
Defendant:
Ant Financial Service Group, Jungong Sun, Daniel Young Zhang and others
Plaintiff:
Hai Dong Li
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Daniel J. Ventricelli v. HN et al
as 7:2020cv00318
Defendant:
William T. Nicklin and HN
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Ventricelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr
Daniel J. Ventricelli v. Nicklin
as 7:2020cv00321
Defendant:
Alexandra Lescop Nicklin
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Ventricelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Sabatano v. Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A. Inc.
as 7:2019cv08924
Defendant:
Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A. Inc. a/k/a Muscletech, Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A. Inc. and Muscletech
Plaintiff:
Tom Sabatano and Daniel Barzoloski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Almaty, Kazakhstan et al v. Sater et al
as 1:2019cv02645
Defendant:
RRMI-DR LLC, Daniel Ridloff, Ferrari Holdings LLC (NJ) and others
Plaintiff:
BTA Bank JSC and City of Almaty, Kazakhstan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
SKAT v. The Robin Daniel Pension Plan et al
as 1:2018cv10096
Defendant:
Matthew Tucci and The Robin Daniel Pension Plan
Plaintiff:
SKAT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Okoe v. Headclicks, Inc.
as 1:2018cv10911
Plaintiff:
Daniel Okoe
Defendant:
Headclicks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SKAT v. The Cardinal Consulting Pension Plan et al
as 1:2018cv10028
Consolidated Defendant:
The Everything Clean LLC 401k Plan, The Dink14 LLC 401k Plan, Vincent Natoli and others
Plaintiff:
SKAT
Defendant:
The Cardinal Consulting Pension Plan and Matthew Tucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
