Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Liu et al v. Rong-Shing, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07136
Plaintiff:
Wen Long Liu , Jian Xing Weng and Xue Qiao Zheng
Defendant:
Rong-Shing, Inc., Bleecker Plaza Realty Corp., Suzie Ying and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Li v. Madison On Columbus Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv09344
Plaintiff:
Mei Ying Li
Defendant:
Madison On Columbus Corp., Albert Wu, Nancy Wu and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Li et al v. Saigon 48, AOKI et al
as 1:2011cv08656
Plaintiff:
Bai Ming Li and Ying Qing Qiu
Defendant:
Saigon 48 , John Doe and AOKI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Xu et al v. 366 East, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv07916
Plaintiff:
John Xu , Yao Xing Xu , Yue Jian Mao and others
Defendant:
366 East, Inc., W&E Hospitality Inc., East Boy Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chen v. Gold & Silver Aging Home Care, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv04938
Plaintiff:
Ying Chen
Defendant:
Gold & Silver Aging Home Care, Inc. and Leonora Hector
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Zang v. Rong-Shing, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01112
Plaintiff:
Guo Feng Zang
Defendant:
Rong-Shing, Inc. , Julie Lau and Suzie Ying
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wong v. Chen et al
as 1:2010cv07401
Plaintiff:
Ngoh Ying Wong
Defendant:
Julie Chen, Ah Fong Chang and Empire Szechuan Noodle House Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ye et al v. Bonnie's Nail and Spa, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv05534
Plaintiff:
Ying Zhen Ye and Qiu Ying Chen
Defendant:
Bonnie's Nail and Spa, Inc. and Mu Li You
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cortes v. Dragon Pavillion Restaurant et al
as 1:2010cv05018
Plaintiff:
Moises Cortes
Defendant:
Dragon Pavillion Restaurant and Ying Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lee v. Aji Sushi Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00418
Plaintiff:
Lai Lee
Defendant:
Aji Sushi Inc., Aji Sushi 519 Inc., Xiao Ying Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
