Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02888
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Hennedige et al v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service
as 1:2010cv02160
Plaintiff:
Manoj Andra Hennedige , Gihan Andra Hennedige and Sampath Andra Hennedige
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 (a) Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv09796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Elmatbagi v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service,
as 1:2009cv09631
Petitioner:
Ahamed Elmatbagi
Respondent:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jamaldeen et al v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service
as 1:2009cv09627
Plaintiff:
Tuan Saam Jamaldeen, Mehroom B. Sahardeen, Tuan Rameez Saam and others
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv09028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 (a) Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv08668
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07357
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
