Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. Elite QSR Management Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv04808
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC , Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC , DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant: Elite QSR Management Corp., East 56 Street Donut Corp., Hutchinson North QSR Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1116
Type: Contract Franchise
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. Tringle Food Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv03060
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC , Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC , DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant: Tringle Food Corp. , Tringle Two Food Corp. and Mohammed Islam
Counter_claimant: Tringle Two Food Corp. , Tringle Food Corp. and Mohammed Islam
Counter_defendant: BR IP Holder LLC, , Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC , DD IP Holder LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1116
Type: Contract Franchise
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. Tringle Food Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv07604
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC , Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC , DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant: Tringle Food Corp. , Tringle Two Food Corp. and Mohammed Islam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Franchise
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants, LLC et al v. Sicomac Partners-Nanuet, Inc. et al
as 7:2011cv05763
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants, LLC , Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC , DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant: Sicomac Partners-Nanuet, Inc. , Sicomac Partners-New City, Inc. , Sicomac Partners-Pearl River, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Type: Contract Franchise
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC et al v. Chelsea DB Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv06922
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC , Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC , DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant: Chelsea DB Associates, Inc., KMT Associate, Inc., New AMD Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Type: Contract Franchise
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. Panzar Boston Post, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv04188
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC , Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC , DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant: Panzar Boston Post, LLC , Panzar Tremont, LLC , Panzar Prospect, LLC and others
Counter_claimant: Panzar Boston Post, LLC, Panzar Tremont, LLC, Panzar Prospect, LLC and others
Counter_defendant: Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC, DD IP Holder LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Contract Franchise
Dunkin Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC et al v. Coffee of Paterson, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv10598
Plaintiff: Dunkin Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Dunkin Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC, Dunkin Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC and others
Defendant: Coffee of Paterson, Inc. and Dharmesh Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. Koumbaro Ventures, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv08562
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant: Koumbaro Ventures, Inc., 687 Amsterdam CD., LLC and 2661 Broadway CD., LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Type: Contract None
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. J.R. Scoops, Inc.
as 7:2009cv06959
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC, DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant: J.R. Scoops, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Type: Contract None
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC et al v. North American Ventures at 23 Lexington, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv06785
Plaintiff: Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC and DD IP Holder LLC
Defendant: North American Ventures at 23 Lexington, Inc., Rekha Channagiri, Bhupinder Singh Julka and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Type: Contract Franchise

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?