Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Finger Lakes Zero Waste Coalition, Inc. et al v. McCarthy et al
as 6:2014cv06542
Plaintiff:
Finger Lakes Zero Waste Coalition, Inc. and Katherine M. Bennett Roll
Defendant:
Gina McCarthy and The United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201
Tann v. Bennett et al
as 1:2013cv00823
Plaintiff:
Lisa Tann
Defendant:
George Alan Bennett and Miranda Bennett
Cause Of Action: International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davidson v. Desai, et al
as 1:2003cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ronald Davidson
Defendant:
Uday K. Desai , Cheng Yin , Heman Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Candelaria v. Baker, et al
as 1:2000cv00912
Plaintiff:
Juan Candelaria
Defendant:
R. Baker , J. Perry , Lane E. Eck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes, et al v. Alves, et al
as 6:2001cv06559
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Donald McIntosh , B. Potter , Angelo Mastrantonio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kirk v. New York State Department of Education et al
as 6:2008cv06016
Plaintiff:
Simon E. Kirk
Defendant:
New York State Department of Education, Richard P. Mills, New York State Board of Regents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
First Derivative Traders L.P. et al v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv06412
Plaintiff:
First Derivative Traders L.P., Bob Palmer and Gloria James-King
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb, Inc., Ronald L. Zarrella, Alan M. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
